replaceFrameIndices(MF) will iterate over the BBs and call
replaceFrameIndices(BB). No functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186141 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Before we could vectorize PHINodes scanning successors was a good way of finding candidates. Now we can vectorize the phinodes which is simpler.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186139 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We had patterns to match v4i32 immAllZerosV -> V_SET0, but not patterns for
v8i16 (which occurs in the test case) or v16i8. The same was true for
V_SETALLONES (so I added the associated patterns for those as well).
Another bug found by llvm-stress.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186108 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Patch by Michele Scandale!
Adds a special handling of the case where, during the loop exit
condition rewriting, the exit value is a constant of bitwidth lower
than the type of the induction variable: instead of introducing a
trunc operation in order to match correctly the operand types, it
allows to convert the constant value to an equivalent constant,
depending on the initial value of the induction variable and the trip
count, in order have an equivalent comparison between the induction
variable and the new constant.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186107 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This fixes a bug (found by csmith) at -O0 where we attempt to create a RLWIMI
with an out-of-range operand. Most uses of the isRunOfOnes function are guarded
by a condition that the value is not zero. This was not true in two places, and
in both places a zero input would result in an out-of-rage MB value (= 32).
To fix this, isRunOfOnes returns false on a zero input (and I've remove one
now-redundant guard).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186101 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We can vectorize them because in the case where we wrap in the address space the
unvectorized code would have had to access a pointer value of zero which is
undefined behavior in address space zero according to the LLVM IR semantics.
(Thank you Duncan, for pointing this out to me).
Fixes PR16592.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186088 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* All systems we support have some form of long name support.
* The options has different names and semantics in different implementations
('f' on gnu, 'T' on OS X), which makes it unlikely it is normally used on
build systems.
* It was completely untested.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186078 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- Coallocate entires for AttributeSetImpls and Nodes after the class itself.
- Remove mutable iterators from immutable classes.
- Remove unused context field from AttributeImpl.
- Derive Enum/Align/String attribute implementations from AttributeImpl instead
of having a whole new inheritance tree for them.
- Derive AlignAttributeImpl from EnumAttributeImpl.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186075 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
RISBG can handle some ANDs for which no AND IMMEDIATE exists.
It also acts as a three-operand AND for some cases where an
AND IMMEDIATE could be used instead.
It might be worth adding a pass to replace RISBG with AND IMMEDIATE
in cases where the register operands end up being the same and where
AND IMMEDIATE is smaller.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186072 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
RISBG has three 8-bit operands (I3, I4 and I5). I'd originally
restricted all three to 6 bits, since that's the only range we intended
to use at the time. However, the top bit of I4 acts as a "zero" flag for
RISBG, while the top bit of I3 acts as a "test" flag for RNSBG & co.
This patch therefore allows them to have the full 8-bit range.
I've left the fifth operand as a 6-bit value for now since the
upper 2 bits have no defined meaning.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186070 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
predecessors of the two blocks it is attempting to merge supply the
same incoming values to any phi in the successor block. This change
allows merging in the case where there is one or more incoming values
that are undef. The undef values are rewritten to match the non-undef
value that flows from the other edge. Patch by Mark Lacey.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186069 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
MF is normally initialized in AsmPrinter::SetupMachineFunction, but if the file
contains only globals (no functions), then we need this to be initialized
because, when encountering an error, lowerConstant() references it.
This should fix the non-deterministic failures of
test/CodeGen/X86/nonconst-static-iv.ll, etc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186068 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When computing currently-live registers, the register scavenger excludes undef
uses. As a result, undef uses are ignored when computing the restore points of
registers spilled into the emergency slots. While the register scavenger
normally excludes from consideration, when scavenging, registers used by the
current instruction, we need to not exclude undef uses. Otherwise, we might end
up requiring more emergency spill slots than we have (in the case where the
undef use *is* the currently-spilled register).
Another bug found by llvm-stress.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186067 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Without the changes introduced into this patch, if TRE saw any allocas at all,
TRE would not perform TRE *or* mark callsites with the tail marker.
Because TRE runs after mem2reg, this inadequacy is not a death sentence. But
given a callsite A without escaping alloca argument, A may not be able to have
the tail marker placed on it due to a separate callsite B having a write-back
parameter passed in via an argument with the nocapture attribute.
Assume that B is the only other callsite besides A and B only has nocapture
escaping alloca arguments (*NOTE* B may have other arguments that are not passed
allocas). In this case not marking A with the tail marker is unnecessarily
conservative since:
1. By assumption A has no escaping alloca arguments itself so it can not
access the caller's stack via its arguments.
2. Since all of B's escaping alloca arguments are passed as parameters with
the nocapture attribute, we know that B does not stash said escaping
allocas in a manner that outlives B itself and thus could be accessed
indirectly by A.
With the changes introduced by this patch:
1. If we see any escaping allocas passed as a capturing argument, we do
nothing and bail early.
2. If we do not see any escaping allocas passed as captured arguments but we
do see escaping allocas passed as nocapture arguments:
i. We do not perform TRE to avoid PR962 since the code generator produces
significantly worse code for the dynamic allocas that would be created
by the TRE algorithm.
ii. If we do not return twice, mark call sites without escaping allocas
with the tail marker. *NOTE* This excludes functions with escaping
nocapture allocas.
3. If we do not see any escaping allocas at all (whether captured or not):
i. If we do not have usage of setjmp, mark all callsites with the tail
marker.
ii. If there are no dynamic/variable sized allocas in the function,
attempt to perform TRE on all callsites in the function.
Based off of a patch by Nick Lewycky.
rdar://14324281.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186057 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I had thought that these tests could be target-neutral, but in practice this is
not the case (on some targets, like Hexagon and Darwin), they trigger an assert
(a different assert than the one that r186044 fixes).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186051 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For some reason, the Hexagon backend does not reject these invalid static
initializer expressions, but instead crashes in AsmPrinter::EmitGlobalConstant.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186045 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A non-constant-foldable static initializer expression containing insertvalue or
extractvalue had been causing an assert:
Constants.cpp:1971: Assertion `FC && "ExtractValue constant expr couldn't be
folded!"' failed.
Now we report a more-sensible "Unsupported expression in static initializer"
error instead.
Fixes PR15417.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@186044 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
