Summary:
Currently, we
1. match `LHS` matcher to the `first` operand of binary operator,
2. and then match `RHS` matcher to the `second` operand of binary operator.
If that does not match, we swap the `LHS` and `RHS` matchers:
1. match `RHS` matcher to the `first` operand of binary operator,
2. and then match `LHS` matcher to the `second` operand of binary operator.
This works ok.
But it complicates writing of commutative matchers, where one would like to match
(`m_Value()`) the value on one side, and use (`m_Specific()`) it on the other side.
This is additionally complicated by the fact that `m_Specific()` stores the `Value *`,
not `Value **`, so it won't work at all out of the box.
The last problem is trivially solved by adding a new `m_c_Specific()` that stores the
`Value **`, not `Value *`. I'm choosing to add a new matcher, not change the existing
one because i guess all the current users are ok with existing behavior,
and this additional pointer indirection may have performance drawbacks.
Also, i'm storing pointer, not reference, because for some mysterious-to-me reason
it did not work with the reference.
The first one appears trivial, too.
Currently, we
1. match `LHS` matcher to the `first` operand of binary operator,
2. and then match `RHS` matcher to the `second` operand of binary operator.
If that does not match, we swap the ~~`LHS` and `RHS` matchers~~ **operands**:
1. match ~~`RHS`~~ **`LHS`** matcher to the ~~`first`~~ **`second`** operand of binary operator,
2. and then match ~~`LHS`~~ **`RHS`** matcher to the ~~`second`~ **`first`** operand of binary operator.
Surprisingly, `$ ninja check-llvm` still passes with this.
But i expect the bots will disagree..
The motivational unittest is included.
I'd like to use this in D45664.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, arsenm, RKSimon
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: xbolva00, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45828
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@331085 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
There aren't any matchers for the three vector operations: insertelement, extractelement, and
shufflevector. This patch adds them as well as corresponding unit tests.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@328709 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
clang-format (https://reviews.llvm.org/D33932) to keep primary headers
at the top and handle new utility headers like 'gmock' consistently with
other utility headers.
No other change was made. I did no manual edits, all of this is
clang-format.
This should allow other changes to have more clear and focused diffs,
and is especially motivated by moving some headers into more focused
libraries.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@304786 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Pattern match has some paths which can operate on constant instructions,
but not all. This adds a version of m_value() to return const Value* and
changes ICmp matching to use auto so that it can match both constant and
mutable instructions.
Tests also included for both mutable and constant ICmpInst matching.
This will be used in a future commit to constify ValueTracking.cpp.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@278570 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reapplies r263258, which was reverted in r263321 because
of issues on Clang side.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263393 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
commit ae14bf6488e8441f0f6d74f00455555f6f3943ac
Author: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
Date: Fri Mar 11 17:15:50 2016 +0000
Remove PreserveNames template parameter from IRBuilder
Summary:
Following r263086, we are now relying on a flag on the Context to
discard Value names in release builds.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18023
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263258
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
until we can figure out what to do about clang and Release build testing.
This reverts commit 263258.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263321 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Following r263086, we are now relying on a flag on the Context to
discard Value names in release builds.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18023
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263258 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This compiles with no changes to clang/lld/lldb with MSVC and includes
overloads to various functions which are used by those projects and llvm
which have OwningPtr's as parameters. This should allow out of tree
projects some time to move. There are also no changes to libs/Target,
which should help out of tree targets have time to move, if necessary.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203083 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
instructions. I needed this for a quick experiment I was making, and
while I've no idea if that will ever get committed, I didn't want to
throw away the pattern match code and for anyone else to have to write
it again. I've added unittests to make sure this works correctly.
In fun news, this also uncovered the IRBuilder bug. Doh!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@198541 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
basic block to hold instructions, and managing all of their lifetimes in
a fixture. This makes it easy to sink the expectations into the test
cases themselves which also makes things a bit more explicit and clearer
IMO.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@198532 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add support for matching 'ordered' and 'unordered' floating point min/max
constructs.
In LLVM we can express min/max functions as a combination of compare and select.
We have support for matching such constructs for integers but not for floating
point. In floating point math there is no total order because of the presence of
'NaN'. Therefore, we have to be careful to preserve the original fcmp semantics
when interpreting floating point compare select combinations as a minimum or
maximum function. The resulting 'ordered/unordered' floating point maximum
function has to select the same value as the select/fcmp combination it is based
on.
ordered_max(x,y) = max(x,y) iff x and y are not NaN, y otherwise
unordered_max(x,y) = max(x,y) iff x and y are not NaN, x otherwise
ordered_min(x,y) = min(x,y) iff x and y are not NaN, y otherwise
unordered_min(x,y) = min(x,y) iff x and y are not NaN, x otherwise
This matches the behavior of the underlying select(fcmp(olt/ult/.., L, R), L, R)
construct.
Any code using this predicate has to preserve this semantics.
A follow-up patch will use this to implement floating point min/max reductions
in the vectorizer.
radar://13723044
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181143 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
