Summary:
Both the input Value pointer and the returned Value
pointers in GetUnderlyingObjects are now declared as
const.
It turned out that all current (in-tree) uses of
GetUnderlyingObjects were trivial to update, being
satisfied with have those Value pointers declared
as const. Actually, in the past several of the users
had to use const_cast, just because of ValueTracking
not providing a version of GetUnderlyingObjects with
"const" Value pointers. With this patch we get rid
of those const casts.
Reviewers: hfinkel, materi, jkorous
Reviewed By: jkorous
Subscribers: dexonsmith, jkorous, jholewinski, sdardis, eraman, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61038
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@359072 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
ConstantRanges have an annoying special case: If upper and lower are
the same, it can be either an empty or a full set. When constructing
constant ranges nearly always a full set is intended, but this still
requires an explicit check in many places.
This revision adds a getNonEmpty() constructor that disambiguates this
case: If upper and lower are the same, a full set is created.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60947
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@358854 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds a WithOverflowInst class with a few helper methods to get
the underlying binop, signedness and nowrap type and makes use of it
where sensible. There will be two more uses in D60650/D60656.
The refactorings are all NFC, though I left some TODOs where things
could be improved. In particular we have two places where add/sub are
handled but mul isn't.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60668
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@358512 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a follow-up patch to D60504 to further improve
performance issues in computeKnownBitsFromAssume.
The patch is NFC, but may improve compile-time performance
if the compiler isn't clever enough to do the optimization
itself.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@358163 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch changes the order of pattern matching by first testing
a compare instruction's predicate, before doing the pattern
match for the whole expression tree.
Patch by Paul Walker.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60504
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@358097 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the same change as D60420 but for signed sub rather than
signed add: Range information is intersected into the known bits
result, allows to detect more no/always overflow conditions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60469
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@358020 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is D59386 for the signed add case. The computeConstantRange()
result is now intersected into the existing known bits information,
allowing to detect additional no-overflow/always-overflow conditions
(though the latter isn't used yet).
This (finally...) covers the motivating case from D59071.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60420
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@358014 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Switch part of the computeOverflowForSignedAdd() implementation to
use Range.isAllNegative() rather than KnownBits.isNegative() and
similar. They do the same thing, but using the ConstantRange methods
allows dropping the KnownBits variables more easily in D60420.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@357969 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add support for min/max flavor selects in computeConstantRange(),
which allows us to fold comparisons of a min/max against a constant
in InstSimplify. This fixes an infinite InstCombine loop, with the
test case taken from D59378.
Relative to the previous iteration, this contains some adjustments for
AMDGPU med3 tests: The AMDGPU target runs InstSimplify prior to codegen,
which ends up constant folding some existing med3 tests after this
change. To preserve these tests a hidden -amdgpu-scalar-ir-passes option
is added, which allows disabling scalar IR passes (that use InstSimplify)
for testing purposes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59506
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@357870 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds ConstantRange::getFull(BitWidth) and
ConstantRange::getEmpty(BitWidth) named constructors as more readable
alternatives to the current ConstantRange(BitWidth, /* full */ false)
and similar. Additionally private getFull() and getEmpty() member
functions are added which return a full/empty range with the same bit
width -- these are commonly needed inside ConstantRange.cpp.
The IsFullSet argument in the ConstantRange(BitWidth, IsFullSet)
constructor is now mandatory for the few usages that still make use of it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59716
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@356852 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We're already computing the known bits of the operands here. If the
known bits of the operands can determine the sign bit of the result,
we'll already catch this in signedAddMayOverflow(). The only other
way (and as the comment already indicates) we'll get new information
from computing known bits on the whole add, is if there's an assumption
on it.
As such, we change the code to only compute known bits from assumptions,
instead of computing full known bits on the add (which would unnecessarily
recompute the known bits of the operands as well).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59473
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@356785 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is D59450, but for signed sub. This case is not NFC, because
the overflow logic in ConstantRange is more powerful than the existing
check. This resolves the TODO in the function.
I've added two tests to show that this indeed catches more cases than
the previous logic, but the main correctness test coverage here is in
the existing ConstantRange unit tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59617
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@356685 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a small followup to D59511. The code that was moved into
computeConstantRange() there is a bit overly conversative: If the
abs is not nsw, it does not compute any range. However, abs without
nsw still has a well-defined contiguous unsigned range from 0 to
SIGNED_MIN. This is a lot less useful than the usual 0 to SIGNED_MAX
range, but if we're already here we might as well specify it...
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59563
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@356586 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Improve computeOverflowForUnsignedAdd/Sub in ValueTracking by
intersecting the computeConstantRange() result into the ConstantRange
created from computeKnownBits(). This allows us to detect some
additional never/always overflows conditions that can't be determined
from known bits.
This revision also adds basic handling for constants to
computeConstantRange(). Non-splat vectors will be handled in a followup.
The signed case will also be handled in a followup, as it needs some
more groundwork.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59386
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@356489 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These changes are related to PR37743 and include:
SelectionDAGBuilder::visitSelect handles the unary SelectPatternFlavor::SPF_ABS case to build ABS node.
Delete the redundant recognizer of the integer ABS pattern from the DAGCombiner.
Add promoting the integer ABS node in the LegalizeIntegerType.
Expand-based legalization of integer result for the ABS nodes.
Expand-based legalization of ABS vector operations.
Add some integer abs testcases for different typesizes for Thumb arch
Add the custom ABS expanding and change the SAD pattern recognizer for X86 arch: The i64 result of the ABS is expanded to:
tmp = (SRA, Hi, 31)
Lo = (UADDO tmp, Lo)
Hi = (XOR tmp, (ADDCARRY tmp, hi, Lo:1))
Lo = (XOR tmp, Lo)
The "detectZextAbsDiff" function is changed for the recognition of pattern with the ABS node. Given a ABS node, detect the following pattern:
(ABS (SUB (ZERO_EXTEND a), (ZERO_EXTEND b))).
Change integer abs testcases for codegen with the ABS node support for AArch64.
Indicate that the ABS is legal for the i64 type when the NEON is supported.
Change the integer abs testcases to show changing of codegen.
Add combine and legalization of ABS nodes for Thumb arch.
Extend 'matchSelectPattern' to recognize the ABS patterns with ICMP_SGE condition.
For discussion, see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37743
Patch by: @ikulagin (Ivan Kulagin)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49837
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@356468 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit 106f0cdefb02afc3064268dc7a71419b409ed2f3.
This change impacts the AMDGPU smed3.ll and umed3.ll codegen tests.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@356424 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add support for min/max flavor selects in computeConstantRange(),
which allows us to fold comparisons of a min/max against a constant
in InstSimplify. This was suggested by spatel as an alternative
approach to D59378. I've also added the infinite looping test from
that revision here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59506
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@356415 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is preparation for D59506. The InstructionSimplify abs handling
is moved into computeConstantRange(), which is the general place for
such calculations. This is NFC and doesn't affect the existing tests
in test/Transforms/InstSimplify/icmp-abs-nabs.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59511
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@356409 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the same change as rL356290, but for signed add. It replaces
the existing ripple logic with the overflow logic in ConstantRange.
This is NFC in that it should return NeverOverflow in exactly the
same cases as the previous implementation. However, it does make
computeOverflowForSignedAdd() more powerful by now also determining
AlwaysOverflows conditions. As none of its consumers handle this yet,
this has no impact on optimization. Making use of AlwaysOverflows
in with.overflow folding will be handled as a followup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59450
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@356345 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Following the suggestion in D59450, I'm moving the code for constructing
a ConstantRange from KnownBits out of ValueTracking, which also allows us
to test this code independently.
I'm adding this method to ConstantRange rather than KnownBits (which
would have been a bit nicer API wise) to avoid creating a dependency
from Support to IR, where ConstantRange lives.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59475
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@356339 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Use the methods introduced in rL356276 to implement the
computeOverflowForUnsigned(Add|Sub) functions in ValueTracking, by
converting the KnownBits into a ConstantRange.
This is NFC: The existing KnownBits based implementation uses the same
logic as the the ConstantRange based one. This is not the case for the
signed equivalents, so I'm only changing unsigned here.
This is in preparation for D59386, which will also intersect the
computeConstantRange() result into the range determined from KnownBits.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@356290 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
InstructionSimplify currently has some code to determine the constant
range of integer instructions for some simple cases. It is used to
simplify icmps.
This change moves the relevant code into ValueTracking as
llvm::computeConstantRange(), so it can also be reused for other
purposes.
In particular this is with the optimization of overflow checks in
mind (ref D59071), where constant ranges cover some cases that
known bits don't.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@355781 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We have two sources of known bits:
1. For adds leading ones of either operand are preserved. For sub
leading zeros of LHS and leading ones of RHS become leading zeros in
the result.
2. The saturating math is a select between add/sub and an all-ones/
zero value. As such we can carry out the add/sub known bits
calculation, and only preseve the known one/zero bits respectively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58329
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@355223 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Second part of D58593.
Compute precise overflow conditions based on all known bits, rather
than just the sign bits. Unsigned a - b overflows iff a < b, and we
can determine whether this always/never happens based on the minimal
and maximal values achievable for a and b subject to the known bits
constraint.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@355109 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The description of KnownBits::zext() and
KnownBits::zextOrTrunc() has confusingly been telling
that the operation is equivalent to zero extending the
value we're tracking. That has not been true, instead
the user has been forced to explicitly set the extended
bits as known zero afterwards.
This patch adds a second argument to KnownBits::zext()
and KnownBits::zextOrTrunc() to control if the extended
bits should be considered as known zero or as unknown.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58650
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@355099 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Part of D58593.
Compute precise overflow conditions based on all known bits, rather
than just the sign bits. Unsigned a + b overflows iff a > ~b, and we
can determine whether this always/never happens based on the minimal
and maximal values achievable for a and ~b subject to the known bits
constraint.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@355072 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Widenable condition intrinsic is guaranteed to return value, notify
the isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor function about it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@354020 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch accompanies the RFC posted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html
This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction to support asm-goto
inline assembly like gcc as used by the linux kernel. This
instruction is both a call instruction and a terminator
instruction with multiple successors. Only inline assembly
usage is supported today.
This also adds a new INLINEASM_BR opcode to SelectionDAG and
MachineIR to represent an INLINEASM block that is also
considered a terminator instruction.
There will likely be more bug fixes and optimizations to follow
this, but we felt it had reached a point where we would like to
switch to an incremental development model.
Patch by Craig Topper, Alexander Ivchenko, Mikhail Dvoretckii
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53765
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@353563 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@351636 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
minted `CallBase` class instead of the `CallSite` wrapper.
This moves the largest interwoven collection of APIs that traffic in
`CallSite`s. While a handful of these could have been migrated with
a minorly more shallow migration by converting from a `CallSite` to
a `CallBase`, it hardly seemed worth it. Most of the APIs needed to
migrate together because of the complex interplay of AA APIs and the
fact that converting from a `CallBase` to a `CallSite` isn't free in its
current implementation.
Out of tree users of these APIs can fairly reliably migrate with some
combination of `.getInstruction()` on the `CallSite` instance and
casting the resulting pointer. The most generic form will look like `CS`
-> `cast_or_null<CallBase>(CS.getInstruction())` but in most cases there
is a more elegant migration. Hopefully, this migrates enough APIs for
users to fully move from `CallSite` to the base class. All of the
in-tree users were easily migrated in that fashion.
Thanks for the review from Saleem!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55641
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@350503 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
GetPointerBaseWithConstantOffset include this code, where ByteOffset
and GEPOffset are both of type llvm::APInt :
ByteOffset += GEPOffset.getSExtValue();
The problem with this line is that getSExtValue() returns an int64_t, but
the += matches an overload for uint64_t. The problem is that the resulting
APInt is no longer considered to be signed. That in turn causes assertion
failures later on if the relevant pointer type is > 64 bits in width and
the GEPOffset was negative.
Changing it to
ByteOffset += GEPOffset.sextOrTrunc(ByteOffset.getBitWidth());
resolves the issue and explicitly performs the sign-extending
or truncation. Additionally, instead of asserting later if the result
is > 64 bits, it breaks out of the loop in that case.
See also
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24729https://reviews.llvm.org/D24772
This commit must be merged after D38662 in order for the test to pass.
Patch by Michael Ferguson <mpfergu@gmail.com>.
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38501
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@350395 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If the shift amount is known, we can determine the known bits of the
output based on the known bits of two inputs.
This is essentially the same functionality as implemented in D54869,
but for ValueTracking rather than InstCombine SimplifyDemandedBits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55140
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@348091 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We were duplicating code around the existing isImpliedCondition() that
checks for a predecessor block/dominating condition, so make that a
wrapper call.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@348088 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Always-overflow was already determined for unsigned addition, but
not subtraction. This patch establishes parity.
This allows us to perform some additional simplifications for
signed saturating subtractions.
This change is part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D54534.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@347771 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In PR39475:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39475
..we may fail to recognize/simplify fabs() in some cases because we do not
canonicalize fcmp with a -0.0 operand.
Adding that canonicalization can cause regressions on min/max FP tests, so
that's this patch: for the purpose of determining whether something is min/max,
let the value returned by the select determine how we treat a 0.0 operand in the fcmp.
This patch doesn't actually change the -0.0 to +0.0. It just changes the analysis, so
we don't fail to recognize equivalent min/max patterns that only differ in the
signbit of 0.0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54001
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@346097 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch gives the IR ComputeNumSignBits the same functionality as the
DAG version (the code is derived from the existing code).
This an extension of the single input shuffle analysis added with D53659.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53987
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@346071 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The motivating case is from PR37549:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37549
The analysis improvement allows us to form a vector 'select' out of
bitwise logic (the use of ComputeNumSignBits was added at rL345149).
The smaller test shows another InstCombine improvement - we use
ComputeNumSignBits to add 'nsw' to shift-left. But the negative
test shows an example where we must not add 'nsw' - when the shuffle
mask contains undef elements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53659
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@345429 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This CL allows constant vectors of floats to be recognized as non-NaN
and non-zero in select patterns. This change makes
`matchSelectPattern` more powerful generally, but was motivated
specifically because I wanted fminnan and fmaxnan to be created for
vector versions of the scalar patterns they are created for.
Tested with check-all on all targets. A testcase in the WebAssembly
backend that tests the non-nan codepath is in an upcoming CL.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52324
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@343364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
his code was in CGDecl.cpp and really belongs in LLVM's isBytewiseValue. Teach isBytewiseValue the tricks clang's isRepeatedBytePattern had, including merging undef properly, and recursing on more types.
clang part of this patch: D51752
Subscribers: dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51751
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342709 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
rL340921 has been reverted by rL340923 due to linkage dependency
from Transform/Utils to Analysis which is not allowed. In this patch
this has been fixed, a new utility function moved to Analysis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51152
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@341014 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
