BCL is normally a conditional branch-and-link instruction, but has
an unconditional form (which is used in the SjLj code, for example).
To make clear that this BCL instruction definition is specifically
the special unconditional form (which does not meaningfully take
a condition-register input), rename it to BCLalways.
No functionality change intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178803 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The LDrs pattern is a duplicate of LD, except that it accepts memory
addresses where the displacement is a symbolLo64. An operand type
"memrs" is defined for just that purpose.
However, this wouldn't be necessary if the default "memrix" operand
type were to simply accept 64-bit symbolic addresses directly.
The only problem with that is that it uses "symbolLo", which is
hardcoded to 32-bit.
To fix this, this commit changes "memri" and "memrix" to use new
operand types for the memory displacement, which allow iPTR
instead of i32. This will also make address parsing easier to
implment in the asm parser.
No change in generated code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178005 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The ADDI/ADDI8 patterns are currently duplicated into ADDIL/ADDI8L,
which describe the same instruction, except that they accept a
symbolLo[64] operand instead of a s16imm[64] operand.
This duplication confuses the asm parser, and it actually not really
needed, since symbolLo[64] already accepts immediate operands anyway.
So this commit removes the duplicate patterns.
No change in generated code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178004 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I recently added a BCL instruction definition as part of implementing SjLj
support. This can also be used to MCize bcl emission in the asm printer.
No functionality change intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177830 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We currently have a duplicated set of call instruction patterns depending
on the ABI to be followed (Darwin vs. Linux). This is a bit odd; while the
different ABIs will result in different instruction sequences, the actual
instructions themselves ought to be independent of the ABI. And in fact it
turns out that the only nontrivial difference between the two sets of
patterns is that in the PPC64 Linux ABI, the instruction used for indirect
calls is marked to take X11 as extra input register (which is indeed used
only with that ABI to hold an incoming environment pointer for nested
functions). However, this does not need to be hard-coded at the .td
pattern level; instead, the C++ code expanding calls can simply add that
use, just like it adds uses for argument registers anyway.
No change in generated code expected.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177735 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Large code model is identical to medium code model except that the
addis/addi sequence for "local" accesses is never used. All accesses
use the addis/ld sequence.
The coding changes are straightforward; most of the patch is taken up
with creating variants of the medium model tests for large model.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@175767 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adjust the r171506 to make all DWARF enconding pc-relative
for PPC64. It also adds the R_PPC64_REL32 relocation handling in MCJIT
(since the eh_frame will not generate PIC-relative relocation) and also
adds the emission of stubs created by the TTypeEncoding.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171979 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
code generation. Variables addressed through a GlobalAlias were not being
handled, and variables with available_externally linkage were treated
incorrectly. The patch contains two new tests to verify the correct code
generation for these cases.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171778 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171366 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
for a wider range of GOT entries that can hold thread-relative offsets.
This matches the behavior of GCC, which was not documented in the PPC64 TLS
ABI. The ABI will be updated with the new code sequence.
Former sequence:
ld 9,x@got@tprel(2)
add 9,9,x@tls
New sequence:
addis 9,2,x@got@tprel@ha
ld 9,x@got@tprel@l(9)
add 9,9,x@tls
Note that a linker optimization exists to transform the new sequence into
the shorter sequence when appropriate, by replacing the addis with a nop
and modifying the base register and relocation type of the ld.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@170209 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
PowerPC target. This is the last of the four models, so we now have
full TLS support.
This is mostly a straightforward extension of the general dynamic model.
I had to use an additional Chain operand to tie ADDIS_DTPREL_HA to the
register copy following ADDI_TLSLD_L; otherwise everything above the
ADDIS_DTPREL_HA appeared dead and was removed.
As before, there are new test cases to test the assembly generation, and
the relocations output during integrated assembly. The expected code
gen sequence can be read in test/CodeGen/PowerPC/tls-ld.ll.
There are a couple of things I think can be done more efficiently in the
overall TLS code, so there will likely be a clean-up patch forthcoming;
but for now I want to be sure the functionality is in place.
Bill
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@170003 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Given a thread-local symbol x with global-dynamic access, the generated
code to obtain x's address is:
Instruction Relocation Symbol
addis ra,r2,x@got@tlsgd@ha R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_HA x
addi r3,ra,x@got@tlsgd@l R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_L x
bl __tls_get_addr(x@tlsgd) R_PPC64_TLSGD x
R_PPC64_REL24 __tls_get_addr
nop
<use address in r3>
The implementation borrows from the medium code model work for introducing
special forms of ADDIS and ADDI into the DAG representation. This is made
slightly more complicated by having to introduce a call to the external
function __tls_get_addr. Using the full call machinery is overkill and,
more importantly, makes it difficult to add a special relocation. So I've
introduced another opcode GET_TLS_ADDR to represent the function call, and
surrounded it with register copies to set up the parameter and return value.
Most of the code is pretty straightforward. I ran into one peculiarity
when I introduced a new PPC opcode BL8_NOP_ELF_TLSGD, which is just like
BL8_NOP_ELF except that it takes another parameter to represent the symbol
("x" above) that requires a relocation on the call. Something in the
TblGen machinery causes BL8_NOP_ELF and BL8_NOP_ELF_TLSGD to be treated
identically during the emit phase, so this second operand was never
visited to generate relocations. This is the reason for the slightly
messy workaround in PPCMCCodeEmitter.cpp:getDirectBrEncoding().
Two new tests are included to demonstrate correct external assembly and
correct generation of relocations using the integrated assembler.
Comments welcome!
Thanks,
Bill
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169910 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
on 64-bit PowerPC ELF.
The patch includes code to handle external assembly and MC output with the
integrated assembler. It intentionally does not support the "old" JIT.
For the initial-exec TLS model, the ABI requires the following to calculate
the address of external thread-local variable x:
Code sequence Relocation Symbol
ld 9,x@got@tprel(2) R_PPC64_GOT_TPREL16_DS x
add 9,9,x@tls R_PPC64_TLS x
The register 9 is arbitrary here. The linker will replace x@got@tprel
with the offset relative to the thread pointer to the generated GOT
entry for symbol x. It will replace x@tls with the thread-pointer
register (13).
The two test cases verify correct assembly output and relocation output
as just described.
PowerPC-specific selection node variants are added for the two
instructions above: LD_GOT_TPREL and ADD_TLS. These are inserted
when an initial-exec global variable is encountered by
PPCTargetLowering::LowerGlobalTLSAddress(), and later lowered to
machine instructions LDgotTPREL and ADD8TLS. LDgotTPREL is a pseudo
that uses the same LDrs support added for medium code model's LDtocL,
with a different relocation type.
The rest of the processing is straightforward.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169281 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169131 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The default for 64-bit PowerPC is small code model, in which TOC entries
must be addressable using a 16-bit offset from the TOC pointer. Additionally,
only TOC entries are addressed via the TOC pointer.
With medium code model, TOC entries and data sections can all be addressed
via the TOC pointer using a 32-bit offset. Cooperation with the linker
allows 16-bit offsets to be used when these are sufficient, reducing the
number of extra instructions that need to be executed. Medium code model
also does not generate explicit TOC entries in ".section toc" for variables
that are wholly internal to the compilation unit.
Consider a load of an external 4-byte integer. With small code model, the
compiler generates:
ld 3, .LC1@toc(2)
lwz 4, 0(3)
.section .toc,"aw",@progbits
.LC1:
.tc ei[TC],ei
With medium model, it instead generates:
addis 3, 2, .LC1@toc@ha
ld 3, .LC1@toc@l(3)
lwz 4, 0(3)
.section .toc,"aw",@progbits
.LC1:
.tc ei[TC],ei
Here .LC1@toc@ha is a relocation requesting the upper 16 bits of the
32-bit offset of ei's TOC entry from the TOC base pointer. Similarly,
.LC1@toc@l is a relocation requesting the lower 16 bits. Note that if
the linker determines that ei's TOC entry is within a 16-bit offset of
the TOC base pointer, it will replace the "addis" with a "nop", and
replace the "ld" with the identical "ld" instruction from the small
code model example.
Consider next a load of a function-scope static integer. For small code
model, the compiler generates:
ld 3, .LC1@toc(2)
lwz 4, 0(3)
.section .toc,"aw",@progbits
.LC1:
.tc test_fn_static.si[TC],test_fn_static.si
.type test_fn_static.si,@object
.local test_fn_static.si
.comm test_fn_static.si,4,4
For medium code model, the compiler generates:
addis 3, 2, test_fn_static.si@toc@ha
addi 3, 3, test_fn_static.si@toc@l
lwz 4, 0(3)
.type test_fn_static.si,@object
.local test_fn_static.si
.comm test_fn_static.si,4,4
Again, the linker may replace the "addis" with a "nop", calculating only
a 16-bit offset when this is sufficient.
Note that it would be more efficient for the compiler to generate:
addis 3, 2, test_fn_static.si@toc@ha
lwz 4, test_fn_static.si@toc@l(3)
The current patch does not perform this optimization yet. This will be
addressed as a peephole optimization in a later patch.
For the moment, the default code model for 64-bit PowerPC will remain the
small code model. We plan to eventually change the default to medium code
model, which matches current upstream GCC behavior. Note that the different
code models are ABI-compatible, so code compiled with different models will
be linked and execute correctly.
I've tested the regression suite and the application/benchmark test suite in
two ways: Once with the patch as submitted here, and once with additional
logic to force medium code model as the default. The tests all compile
cleanly, with one exception. The mandel-2 application test fails due to an
unrelated ABI compatibility with passing complex numbers. It just so happens
that small code model was incredibly lucky, in that temporary values in
floating-point registers held the expected values needed by the external
library routine that was called incorrectly. My current thought is to correct
the ABI problems with _Complex before making medium code model the default,
to avoid introducing this "regression."
Here are a few comments on how the patch works, since the selection code
can be difficult to follow:
The existing logic for small code model defines three pseudo-instructions:
LDtoc for most uses, LDtocJTI for jump table addresses, and LDtocCPT for
constant pool addresses. These are expanded by SelectCodeCommon(). The
pseudo-instruction approach doesn't work for medium code model, because
we need to generate two instructions when we match the same pattern.
Instead, new logic in PPCDAGToDAGISel::Select() intercepts the TOC_ENTRY
node for medium code model, and generates an ADDIStocHA followed by either
a LDtocL or an ADDItocL. These new node types correspond naturally to
the sequences described above.
The addis/ld sequence is generated for the following cases:
* Jump table addresses
* Function addresses
* External global variables
* Tentative definitions of global variables (common linkage)
The addis/addi sequence is generated for the following cases:
* Constant pool entries
* File-scope static global variables
* Function-scope static variables
Expanding to the two-instruction sequences at select time exposes the
instructions to subsequent optimization, particularly scheduling.
The rest of the processing occurs at assembly time, in
PPCAsmPrinter::EmitInstruction. Each of the instructions is converted to
a "real" PowerPC instruction. When a TOC entry needs to be created, this
is done here in the same manner as for the existing LDtoc, LDtocJTI, and
LDtocCPT pseudo-instructions (I factored out a new routine to handle this).
I had originally thought that if a TOC entry was needed for LDtocL or
ADDItocL, it would already have been generated for the previous ADDIStocHA.
However, at higher optimization levels, the ADDIStocHA may appear in a
different block, which may be assembled textually following the block
containing the LDtocL or ADDItocL. So it is necessary to include the
possibility of creating a new TOC entry for those two instructions.
Note that for LDtocL, we generate a new form of LD called LDrs. This
allows specifying the @toc@l relocation for the offset field of the LD
instruction (i.e., the offset is replaced by a SymbolLo relocation).
When the peephole optimization described above is added, we will need
to do similar things for all immediate-form load and store operations.
The seven "mcm-n.ll" test cases are kept separate because otherwise the
intermingling of various TOC entries and so forth makes the tests fragile
and hard to understand.
The above assumes use of an external assembler. For use of the
integrated assembler, new relocations are added and used by
PPCELFObjectWriter. Testing is done with "mcm-obj.ll", which tests for
proper generation of the various relocations for the same sequences
tested with the external assembler.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@168708 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The last remaining bit is "bcl 20, 31, AnonSymbol", which I couldn't find the
instruction definition for. Only whitespace changes in assembly output.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@168541 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The Z constraint specifies an r+r memory address, and the y modifier expands
to the "r, r" in the asm string. For this initial implementation, the base
register is forced to r0 (which has the special meaning of 0 for r+r addressing
on PowerPC) and the full address is taken in the second register. In the
future, this should be improved.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@167388 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
r165941: Resubmit the changes to llvm core to update the functions to
support different pointer sizes on a per address space basis.
Despite this commit log, this change primarily changed stuff outside of
VMCore, and those changes do not carry any tests for correctness (or
even plausibility), and we have consistently found questionable or flat
out incorrect cases in these changes. Most of them are probably correct,
but we need to devise a system that makes it more clear when we have
handled the address space concerns correctly, and ideally each pass that
gets updated would receive an accompanying test case that exercises that
pass specificaly w.r.t. alternate address spaces.
However, from this commit, I have retained the new C API entry points.
Those were an orthogonal change that probably should have been split
apart, but they seem entirely good.
In several places the changes were very obvious cleanups with no actual
multiple address space code added; these I have not reverted when
I spotted them.
In a few other places there were merge conflicts due to a cleaner
solution being implemented later, often not using address spaces at all.
In those cases, I've preserved the new code which isn't address space
dependent.
This is part of my ongoing effort to clean out the partial address space
code which carries high risk and low test coverage, and not likely to be
finished before the 3.2 release looms closer. Duncan and I would both
like to see the above issues addressed before we return to these
changes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@167222 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds initial PPC64 TOC MC object creation using the small mcmodel
(a single 64K TOC) adding the some TOC relocations (R_PPC64_TOC,
R_PPC64_TOC16, and R_PPC64_TOC16DS).
The addition of 'undefinedExplicitRelSym' hook on 'MCELFObjectTargetWriter'
is meant to avoid the creation of an unreferenced ".TOC." symbol (used in
the .odp creation) as well to set the R_PPC64_TOC relocation target as the
temporary ".TOC." symbol. On PPC64 ABI, the R_PPC64_TOC relocation should
not point to any symbol.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166677 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch replaces the EmitRawText by a EmitTCEntry class (specialized for
each Streamer) in PowerPC64 TOC entry creation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165940 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We need to reserve space for the mandatory traceback fields,
though leaving them as zero is appropriate for now.
Although the ABI calls for these fields to be filled in fully, no
compiler on Linux currently does this, and GDB does not read these
fields. GDB uses the first word of zeroes during exception handling to
find the end of the function and the size field, allowing it to compute
the beginning of the function. DWARF information is used for everything
else. We need the extra 8 bytes of pad so the size field is found in
the right place.
As a comparison, GCC fills in a few of the fields -- language, number
of saved registers -- but ignores the rest. IBM's proprietary OSes do
make use of the full traceback table facility.
Patch by Bill Schmidt.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@162854 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
traceback table on PowerPC64. This helps gdb handle exceptions. The other
mandatory fields are ignored by gdb and harder to implement so just add
there a FIXME.
Patch by Bill Schmidt. PR13641.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@162778 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add subtargets for Freescale e500mc (32-bit) and e5500 (64-bit) to
the PowerPC backend.
Patch by Tobias von Koch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@162764 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
include/llvm/Analysis/DebugInfo.h to include/llvm/DebugInfo.h.
The reasoning is because the DebugInfo module is simply an interface to the
debug info MDNodes and has nothing to do with analysis.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@159312 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
up to r158925 were handled as processor specific. Making them
generic and putting tests for these modifiers in the CodeGen/Generic
directory caused a number of targets to fail.
This commit addresses that problem by having the targets call
the generic routine for generic modifiers that they don't currently
have explicit code for.
For now only generic print operands 'c' and 'n' are supported.vi
Affected files:
test/CodeGen/Generic/asm-large-immediate.ll
lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCAsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/NVPTX/NVPTXAsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/ARM/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/XCore/XCoreAsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/X86/X86AsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonAsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/CellSPU/SPUAsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/Sparc/SparcAsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/MBlaze/MBlazeAsmPrinter.cpp
lib/Target/Mips/MipsAsmPrinter.cpp
MSP430 isn't represented because it did not even run with
the long existing 'c' modifier and it was not apparent what
needs to be done to get it inline asm ready.
Contributer: Jack Carter
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@159203 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The PPC target feature gpul (IsGigaProcessor) was only used for one thing:
To enable the generation of the MFOCRF instruction. Furthermore, this
instruction is available on other PPC cores outside of the G5 line. This
feature now corresponds to the HasMFOCRF flag.
No functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@158323 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds a full itinerary for IBM's PPC64 A2 embedded core. These
cores form the basis for the CPUs in the new IBM BG/Q supercomputer.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@153842 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Reverting this because it breaks static linking on ppc64. Specifically, it may be linkonce_odr functions that are the problem.
With this patch, if you link statically, calls to some functions end up calling their descriptor addresses instead
of calling to their entry points. This causes the execution to fail with SIGILL (b/c the descriptor address just
has some pointers, not code).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@151433 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The standard function epilog includes a .size directive, but ppc64 uses
an alternate local symbol to tag the actual start of each function.
Until recently, binutils accepted the .size directive as:
.size test1, .Ltmp0-test1
however, using this directive with recent binutils will result in the error:
.size expression for XXX does not evaluate to a constant
so we must use the label which actually tags the start of the function.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@151200 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
