not legal. However, it should use a div instruction + mul + sub if divide is
legal. The rem legalization code was missing a check and incorrectly uses a
divrem libcall even when div is legal.
rdar://12481395
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165778 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Not all instructions define a virtual register in their first operand.
Specifically, INLINEASM has a different format.
<rdar://problem/12472811>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165721 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For function calls on the 64-bit PowerPC SVR4 target, each parameter
is mapped to as many doublewords in the parameter save area as
necessary to hold the parameter. The first 13 non-varargs
floating-point values are passed in registers; any additional
floating-point parameters are passed in the parameter save area. A
single-precision floating-point parameter (32 bits) must be mapped to
the second (rightmost, low-order) word of its assigned doubleword
slot.
Currently LLVM violates this ABI requirement by mapping such a
parameter to the first (leftmost, high-order) word of its assigned
doubleword slot. This is internally self-consistent but will not
interoperate correctly with libraries compiled with an ABI-compliant
compiler.
This patch corrects the problem by adjusting the parameter addressing
on both sides of the calling convention.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165714 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Original message:
The attached is the fix to radar://11663049. The optimization can be outlined by following rules:
(select (x != c), e, c) -> select (x != c), e, x),
(select (x == c), c, e) -> select (x == c), x, e)
where the <c> is an integer constant.
The reason for this change is that : on x86, conditional-move-from-constant needs two instructions;
however, conditional-move-from-register need only one instruction.
While the LowerSELECT() sounds to be the most convenient place for this optimization, it turns out to be a bad place. The reason is that by replacing the constant <c> with a symbolic value, it obscure some instruction-combining opportunities which would otherwise be very easy to spot. For that reason, I have to postpone the change to last instruction-combining phase.
The change passes the test of "make check-all -C <build-root/test" and "make -C project/test-suite/SingleSource".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165661 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the compiler makes use of GPR0. However, there are two flavors of
GPR0 defined by the target: the 32-bit GPR0 (R0) and the 64-bit GPR0
(X0). The spill/reload code makes use of R0 regardless of whether we
are generating 32- or 64-bit code.
This patch corrects the problem in the obvious manner, using X0 and
ADDI8 for 64-bit and R0 and ADDI for 32-bit.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165658 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the Altivec extensions were introduced. Its use is optional, and
allows the compiler to communicate to the operating system which
vector registers should be saved and restored during a context switch.
In practice, this information is ignored by the various operating
systems using the SVR4 ABI; the kernel saves and restores the entire
register state. Setting the VRSAVE register is no longer performed by
the AIX XL compilers, the IBM i compilers, or by GCC on Power Linux
systems. It seems best to avoid this logic within LLVM as well.
This patch avoids generating code to update and restore VRSAVE for the
PowerPC SVR4 ABIs (32- and 64-bit). The code remains in place for the
Darwin ABI.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165656 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- Due to the current matching vector elements constraints in
ISD::FP_ROUND, rounding from v2f64 to v4f32 (after legalization from
v2f32) is scalarized. Add a customized v2f32 widening to convert it
into a target-specific X86ISD::VFPROUND to work around this
constraints.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165631 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
SDNode for LDRB_POST_IMM is invalid: number of registers added to SDNode fewer
that described in .td.
7 ops is needed, but SDNode with only 6 is created.
In more details:
In ARMInstrInfo.td, in multiclass AI2_ldridx, in definition _POST_IMM, offset
operand is defined as am2offset_imm. am2offset_imm is complex parameter type,
and actually it consists from dummy register and imm itself. As I understood
trick with dummy reg was made for AsmParser. In ARMISelLowering.cpp, this dummy
register was not added to SDNode, and it cause crash in Peephole Optimizer pass.
The problem fixed by setting up additional dummy reg when emitting
LDRB_POST_IMM instruction.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165617 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
SchedulerDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph ignores dependencies between FixedStack
objects and byval parameters. So loading byval parameters from stack may be
inserted *before* it will be stored, since these operations are treated as
independent.
Fix:
Currently ARMTargetLowering::LowerFormalArguments saves byval registers with
FixedStack MachinePointerInfo. To fix the problem we need to store byval
registers with MachinePointerInfo referenced to first the "byval" parameter.
Also commit adds two new fields to the InputArg structure: Function's argument
index and InputArg's part offset in bytes relative to the start position of
Function's argument. E.g.: If function's argument is 128 bit width and it was
splitted onto 32 bit regs, then we got 4 InputArg structs with same arg index,
but different offset values.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165616 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When the CFG contains a loop with multiple entry blocks, the traces
computed by MachineTraceMetrics don't always have the same nice
properties. Loop back-edges are normally excluded from traces, but
MachineLoopInfo doesn't recognize loops with multiple entry blocks, so
those back-edges may be included.
Avoid asserting when that happens by adding an isEarlierInSameTrace()
function that accurately determines if a dominating block is part of the
same trace AND is above the currrent block in the trace.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165434 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Vector compare using altivec 'vcmpxxx' instructions have as third argument
a vector register instead of CR one, different from integer and float-point
compares. This leads to a failure in code generation, where 'SelectSETCC'
expects a DAG with a CR register and gets vector register instead.
This patch changes the behavior by just returning a DAG with the
vector compare instruction based on the type. The patch also adds a testcase
for all vector types llvm defines.
It also included a fix on signed 5-bits predicates printing, where
signed values were not handled correctly as signed (char are unsigned by
default for PowerPC). This generates 'vspltisw' (vector splat)
instruction with SIM out of range.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165419 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Make sure functions located in user specified text sections (via the
section attribute) are located together with the default text sections.
Otherwise, for large object files, the relocations for call instructions
are more likely to be out of range. This becomes even more likely in the
presence of LTO.
rdar://12402636
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165254 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
in the Intel syntax.
The MC layer supports emitting in the Intel syntax, but this would require the
inline assembly MachineInstr to be lowered to an MCInst before emission. This
is potential future work, but for now emitting directly from the MachineInstr
suffices.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165173 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
multiple stores with a single load. We create the wide loads and stores (and their chains)
before we remove the scalar loads and stores and fix the DAG chain. We attempted to merge
loads with a different chain. When that happened, the assumption that it is safe to RAUW
broke and a cycle was introduced.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165148 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
is not profitable in many cases because modern processors perform multiple stores
in parallel and merging stores prior to merging requires extra work. We handle two main cases:
1. Store of multiple consecutive constants:
q->a = 3;
q->4 = 5;
In this case we store a single legal wide integer.
2. Store of multiple consecutive loads:
int a = p->a;
int b = p->b;
q->a = a;
q->b = b;
In this case we load/store either ilegal vector registers or legal wide integer registers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165125 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Enable the pass by default for targets that request it, and change the
-enable-early-ifcvt to the opposite -disable-early-ifcvt.
There are still some x86 regressions when enabling early if-conversion
because of the missing machine models. Disable the pass for x86 until
machine models are added.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165075 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
X86DAGToDAGISel::PreprocessISelDAG(), isel is moving load inside
callseq_start / callseq_end so it can be folded into a call. This can
create a cycle in the DAG when the call is glued to a copytoreg. We
have been lucky this hasn't caused too many issues because the pre-ra
scheduler has special handling of call sequences. However, it has
caused a crash in a specific tailcall case.
rdar://12393897
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165072 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
JoinVals::pruneValues() calls LIS->pruneValue() to avoid conflicts when
overlapping two different values. This produces a set of live range end
points that are used to reconstruct the live range (with SSA update)
after joining the two registers.
When a value is pruned twice, the set of end points was insufficient:
v1 = DEF
v1 = REPLACE1
v1 = REPLACE2
KILL v1
The end point at KILL would only reconstruct the live range from
REPLACE2 to KILL, leaving the range REPLACE1-REPLACE2 dead.
Add REPLACE2 as an end point in this case so the full live range is
reconstructed.
This fixes PR13999.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165056 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the add/sub case since in the case of multiplication you also have to check that
the operation in the larger type did not overflow.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165017 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- Update maximal stack alignment when stack arguments are prepared before a
call.
- Test cases are enhanced to show it's not a Win32 specific issue but a generic
one.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164946 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
because moden processos can store multiple values in parallel, and preparing the consecutive store requires
some work. We only handle these cases:
1. Consecutive stores where the values and consecutive loads. For example:
int a = p->a;
int b = p->b;
q->a = a;
q->b = b;
2. Consecutive stores where the values are constants. Foe example:
q->a = 4;
q->b = 5;
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164910 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
buildbots. Original commit message:
A DAGCombine optimization for merging consecutive stores. This optimization is not profitable in many cases
because moden processos can store multiple values in parallel, and preparing the consecutive store requires
some work. We only handle these cases:
1. Consecutive stores where the values and consecutive loads. For example:
int a = p->a;
int b = p->b;
q->a = a;
q->b = b;
2. Consecutive stores where the values are constants. Foe example:
q->a = 4;
q->b = 5;
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164890 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
because moden processos can store multiple values in parallel, and preparing the consecutive store requires
some work. We only handle these cases:
1. Consecutive stores where the values and consecutive loads. For example:
int a = p->a;
int b = p->b;
q->a = a;
q->b = b;
2. Consecutive stores where the values are constants. Foe example:
q->a = 4;
q->b = 5;
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164885 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
