Use StringRef for CountingFunctionName, remove erroneous comment
copied from InstructionNamer, and drop some trailing whitespace.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316644 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I'm considering implementing the mnemonic spell checker for x86, and that would require the separate intel and att variants.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316641 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Also only emit in targets that specificially request it. This is required so we don't get an unused static function error.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316640 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
On FreeBSD11.0 the FileCheck NOT string "1.0" will be matched by
`.amd_amdgpu_isa "amdgcn-unknown-freebsd11.0--gfx802"` at the end of the
file. Add a CHECK for that directive to avoid failing the test.
Reviewers: rampitec, kzhuravl
Reviewed By: rampitec, kzhuravl
Subscribers: emaste, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits, krytarowski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39306
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316616 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Max backedge taken count is always expected to be a constant; and this is
usually true by construction -- it is a SCEV expression with constant inputs.
However, if the max backedge expression ends up being computed to be a udiv with
a constant zero denominator[0], SCEV does not fold the result to a constant
since there is no constant it can fold it to (SCEV has no representation for
"infinity" or "undef").
However, in computeMaxBECountForLT we already know the denominator is positive,
and thus at least 1; and we can use this fact to avoid dividing by zero.
[0]: We can end up with a constant zero denominator if the signed range of the
stride is more precise than the unsigned range.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316615 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add a CFI protection check that is implemented by building a graph and inspecting the output to deduce if the indirect CF instruction is CFI protected. Also added the output of this instruction to printIndirectInstructions().
Reviewers: vlad.tsyrklevich
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kcc, pcc, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38428
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316610 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In getOffsetRange, Max can be set to 0 to force the extender replacement
to be at or below the original value. This would cause the new offset to
be non-negative, which is preferred for memory instructions (to reduce
the likelihood of it getting constant-extended due to predication). The
problem happens when the range is shifted by an offset (present in the
instruction being examined) and the offset is negative. The entire range
for the allowable deviation will then be strictly negative. This creates
a problem, since 0 is assumed to be a valid deviation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316601 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As indicated by Table 1-1 in Intel Architecture Instruction Set Extensions and Future Features Programming Reference from October 2017.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316592 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: For some irreducible CFG the domtree nodes might be dead, do not update domtree for dead nodes.
Reviewers: kuhar, dberlin, hfinkel
Reviewed By: kuhar
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mcrosier
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38960
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316582 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch adds a new pass for attaching !callees metadata to indirect call
sites. The pass propagates values to call sites by performing an IPSCCP-like
analysis using the generic sparse propagation solver. For indirect call sites
having a small set of possible callees, the attached metadata indicates what
those callees are. The metadata can be used to facilitate optimizations like
intersecting the function attributes of the possible callees, refining the call
graph, performing indirect call promotion, etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37355
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316576 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In a case when number of output constraint operands that has matched input operands
doesn't fit to signed char, TargetLowering::ParseConstraints() can try to access
ConstraintOperands (that is std::vector) with negative index.
Reviewers: rampitec, arsenm
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39125
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316574 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Remove the G_FADD testcases from arm-legalizer.mir, they are covered by
arm-legalizer-fp.mir (I probably forgot to delete them when I created
that test).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316573 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
No need to check register classes in the register block anymore, since
we can now much more conveniently check them at their def.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316572 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We were generating BLX for all the calls, which was incorrect in most
cases. Update ARMCallLowering to generate BL for direct calls, and BLX,
BX_CALL or BMOVPCRX_CALL for indirect calls.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316570 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Separate the test cases that deal with calls from the rest of the IR
Translator tests.
We split into 2 different files, one for testing parameter and result
lowering, and one for testing the various different kinds of calls that
can occur (BL, BLX, BX_CALL etc).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316569 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Compute the actual decomposition only after deciding whether to expand
of not. Else, it's easy to make the compiler OOM with:
`memcpy(dst, src, 0xffffffffffffffff);`, which typically happens if
someone mistakenly passes a negative value. Add a test.
This reverts commit f8fc02fbd4.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316567 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Duplicated code found in three places put into a new static function:
/// Given a Count of resource usage and a Latency value, return true if a
/// SchedBoundary becomes resource limited.
static bool checkResourceLimit(unsigned LFactor, unsigned Count,
unsigned Latency) {
return (int)(Count - (Latency * LFactor)) > (int)LFactor;
}
Review: Florian Hahn, Matthias Braun
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39235
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316560 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously, the dllimport attribute did the right thing in terms
of treating it as a pointer to a value, but this makes sure the
names get mangled properly, and calls to such functions load the
function from the __imp_ pointer.
This is based on SVN r212431 and r212430 where the same was
implemented for ARM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38530
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316555 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This code added in r297930 assumed that it could create
a select with a condition type that is just an integer
bitcast of the selected type. For AMDGPU any vselect is
going to be scalarized (although the vector types are legal),
and all select conditions must be i1 (the same as getSetCCResultType).
This logic doesn't really make sense to me, but there's
never really been a consistent policy in what the select
condition mask type is supposed to be. Try to extend
the logic for skipping the transform for condition types
that aren't setccs. It doesn't seem quite right to me though,
but checking conditions that seem more sensible (like whether the
vselect is going to be expanded) doesn't work since this
seems to depend on that also.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316554 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
IRCE for unsigned latch conditions was temporarily disabled by rL314881. The motivating
example contained an unsigned latch condition and a signed range check. One of the safe
iteration ranges was `[1, SINT_MAX + 1]`. Its right border was incorrectly interpreted as a negative
value in `IntersectRange` function, this lead to a miscompile under which we deleted a range check
without inserting a postloop where it was needed.
This patch brings back IRCE for unsigned latch conditions. Now we treat range intersection more
carefully. If the latch condition was unsigned, we only try to consider a range check for deletion if:
1. The range check is also unsigned, or
2. Safe iteration range of the range check lies within `[0, SINT_MAX]`.
The same is done for signed latch.
Values from `[0, SINT_MAX]` are unambiguous, these values are non-negative under any interpretation,
and all values of a range intersected with such range are also non-negative.
We also use signed/unsigned min/max functions for range intersection depending on type of the
latch condition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38581
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316552 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Memory dependence analysis no longer counts DbgInfoIntrinsics towards the
limit where to abort the analysis. Before, a bunch of calls to dbg.value
could affect the generated code, meaning that with -g we could generate
different code than without.
Reviewers: chandlerc, Prazek, davide, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39181
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316551 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For a SCEV range, this patch replaces the naive emptiness check for SCEV ranges
which looks like `Begin == End` with a SCEV check. The range is guaranteed to be
empty of `Begin >= End`. We should filter such ranges out and do not try to perform
IRCE for them.
For example, we can get such range when intersecting range `[A, B)` and `[C, D)`
where `A < B < C < D`. The resulting range is `[max(A, C), min(B, D)) = [C, B)`.
This range is empty, but its `Begin` does not match with `End`.
Making IRCE for an empty range is basically safe but unprofitable because we
never actually get into the main loop where the range checks are supposed to
be eliminated. This patch uses SCEV mechanisms to treat loops with proved
`Begin >= End` as empty.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39082
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316550 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
With r314527, promoted values get a suffix that is a decimal value of
the module hash instead of hex. Change the regex to match only decimal
suffix values.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316544 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is in preparation for testing lld's upcoming relocation packing
feature (D39152). I have verified that this implementation correctly
unpacks the relocations from a Chromium DSO built with gold and the
Android relocation packer for ARM32 and ARM64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39272
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316543 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Similar to how llvm::salvagDebugInfo hooks into InstCombine, this adds
a hook that can be invoked before an SDNode that is associated with an
SDDbgValue is erased to capture the effect of the deleted node in a
DIExpression.
The motivating example is an SDDebugValue attached to an ADD operation
that gets folded into a LOAD+OFFSET operation.
rdar://problem/32121503
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@316525 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
