Summary:
And now that we no longer have to explicitly free() the Loop instances, we can
(with more ease) use the destructor of LoopBase to do what LoopBase::clear() was
doing.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38201
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@314375 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is to fix PR34257. rL309059 takes an early return when FindLIVLoopCondition
fails to find a loop invariant condition. This is wrong and it will disable loop
unswitch for select. The patch fixes the bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36985
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@312045 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch makes LoopUnswitch use new incremental API for updating dominators.
It also updates SplitCriticalEdge, as it is called in LoopUnswitch.
There doesn't seem to be any noticeable performance difference when bootstrapping clang with this patch.
Reviewers: dberlin, davide, sanjoy, grosser, chandlerc
Reviewed By: davide, grosser
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35528
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@311093 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a workaround for the bug described in PR31652 and
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115497.html. The temporary
solution is to add a function EqualityPropUnSafe. In EqualityPropUnSafe, for
some simple patterns we can know the equality comparison may contains undef,
so we regard such comparison as unsafe and will not do loop-unswitching for
them. We also need to disable the select simplification when one of select
operand is undef and its result feeds into equality comparison.
The patch cannot clear the safety issue caused by the bug, but it can suppress
the issue from happening to some extent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35811
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309059 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@304787 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
having it internally allocate the loop.
This is a much more flexible API and necessary in the new loop unswitch
to reasonably support both new and old PMs in common code. It also just
seems like a cleaner separation of concerns.
NFC, this should just be a pure refactoring.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33528
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303834 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I fixed my miscompile in r301722 and I hope I don't have to take
a look at this code again now that Chandler has a new LoopUnswitch
pass, but maybe this could be of use for somebody else in the
meanwhile.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@301723 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While debugging a miscompile I realized loopunswitch doesn't
put newlines when printing the instruction being replacement.
Ending up with a single line with many instruction replaced isn't
the best for readability and/or mental sanity.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@301692 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Commits were:
"Use WeakVH instead of WeakTrackingVH in AliasSetTracker's UnkownInsts"
"Add a new WeakVH value handle; NFC"
"Rename WeakVH to WeakTrackingVH; NFC"
The changes assumed pointers are 8 byte aligned on all architectures.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@301429 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
I plan to use WeakVH to mean "nulls itself out on deletion, but does
not track RAUW" in a subsequent commit.
Reviewers: dblaikie, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: arsenm, mehdi_amini, mcrosier, mzolotukhin, jfb, llvm-commits, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32266
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@301424 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and to expose a handle to represent the actual case rather than having
the iterator return a reference to itself.
All of this allows the iterator to be used with common STL facilities,
standard algorithms, etc.
Doing this exposed some missing facilities in the iterator facade that
I've fixed and required some work to the actual iterator to fully
support the necessary API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31548
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@300032 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Loop unswitching can be extremely harmful for a SIMT target. In case
if hoisted condition is not uniform a SIMT machine will execute both
clones of a loop sequentially. Therefor LoopUnswitch checks if the
condition is non-divergent.
Since DivergenceAnalysis adds an expensive PostDominatorTree analysis
not needed for non-SIMT targets a new option is added to avoid unneded
analysis initialization. The method getAnalysisUsage is called when
TargetTransformInfo is not yet available and we cannot use it here.
For that reason a new field DivergentTarget is added to PassManagerBuilder
to control the behavior and set this field from a target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30796
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@298104 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
LoopUnswitch/simplify-with-nonvalness.ll is the test case for this.
The LIC has 2 users and deleting the 1st user when it can be simplified
invalidated the iterator for the 2nd user.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@296069 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: In case we do not know what the condition is in an unswitched loop, but we know its definitely NOT a known constant. We can perform simplifcations based on this information.
Reviewers: sanjoy, hfinkel, chenli, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: david2050, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28968
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@296041 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Chandler mentioned at the last social that the need for BFI in the new pass manager was causing a slight hiccup for this pass. Given this code has been checked in, but off for over a year, it makes sense to just remove it for now.
Note that there's nothing wrong with the general idea - it's actually a quite good one - and once we have the infrastructure in place to implement this without the full recompuation on every loop, we absolutely should.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@294715 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by
assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This
new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less
code...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289756 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The iterative algorithm for Loop Unswitching may render some of the branches unreachable in the unswitched loops.
Given the exponential nature of the algorithm, this is quite an overhead.
This patch fixes this problem by selectively unswitching only those branches within a loop that are reachable from the loop header.
Reviewers: Michael Zolothukin, Anna Thomas, Weiming Zhao.
Subscribers: llvm-commits.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D26299
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@287925 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a mechanical change of comments in switches like fallthrough,
fall-through, or fall-thru to use the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro instead.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@278902 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This is a straightforward extension of what LoopUnswitch does to
branches to guards. That is, we unswitch
```
for (;;) {
...
guard(loop_invariant_cond);
...
}
```
into
```
if (loop_invariant_cond) {
for (;;) {
...
// There is no need to emit guard(true)
...
}
} else {
for (;;) {
...
guard(false);
// SimplifyCFG will clean this up by adding an
// unreachable after the guard(false)
...
}
}
```
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21725
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@273801 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Loop unswitching may cause MSan false positive when the unswitch
condition is not guaranteed to execute.
This is very similar to ASan and TSan special case in
llvm::isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute (they don't like speculative loads
and stores), but for branch instructions.
This is a workaround for PR28054.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@272421 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We were overly cautious in our analysis of loops which have invokes
which unwind to EH pads. The loop unroll transform is safe because it
only clones blocks in the loop body, it does not try to split critical
edges involving EH pads. Instead, move the necessary safety check to
LoopUnswitch.
N.B. The safety check for loop unswitch is covered by an existing test
which fails without it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@268357 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch implements a optimization bisect feature, which will allow optimizations to be selectively disabled at compile time in order to track down test failures that are caused by incorrect optimizations.
The bisection is enabled using a new command line option (-opt-bisect-limit). Individual passes that may be skipped call the OptBisect object (via an LLVMContext) to see if they should be skipped based on the bisect limit. A finer level of control (disabling individual transformations) can be managed through an addition OptBisect method, but this is not yet used.
The skip checking in this implementation is based on (and replaces) the skipOptnoneFunction check. Where that check was being called, a new call has been inserted in its place which checks the bisect limit and the optnone attribute. A new function call has been added for module and SCC passes that behaves in a similar way.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@267022 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Clarify what this RemapFlag actually means.
- Change the flag name to match its intended behaviour.
- Clearly document that it's not supposed to affect globals.
- Add a host of FIXMEs to indicate how to fix the behaviour to match
the intent of the flag.
RF_IgnoreMissingLocals should only affect the behaviour of
RemapInstruction for function-local operands; namely, for operands of
type Argument, Instruction, and BasicBlock. Currently, it is *only*
passed into RemapInstruction calls (and the transitive MapValue calls
that it makes).
When I split Metadata from Value I didn't understand the flag, and I
used it in a bunch of places for "global" metadata.
This commit doesn't have any functionality change, but prepares to
cleanup MapMetadata and MapValue.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@265628 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
routine.
We were getting this wrong in small ways and generally being very
inconsistent about it across loop passes. Instead, let's have a common
place where we do this. One minor downside is that this will require
some analyses like SCEV in more places than they are strictly needed.
However, this seems benign as these analyses are complete no-ops, and
without this consistency we can in many cases end up with the legacy
pass manager scheduling deciding to split up a loop pass pipeline in
order to run the function analysis half-way through. It is very, very
annoying to fix these without just being very pedantic across the board.
The only loop passes I've not updated here are ones that use
AU.setPreservesAll() such as IVUsers (an analysis) and the pass printer.
They seemed less relevant.
With this patch, almost all of the problems in PR24804 around loop pass
pipelines are fixed. The one remaining issue is that we run simplify-cfg
and instcombine in the middle of the loop pass pipeline. We've recently
added some loop variants of these passes that would seem substantially
cleaner to use, but this at least gets us much closer to the previous
state. Notably, the seven loop pass managers is down to three.
I've not updated the loop passes using LoopAccessAnalysis because that
analysis hasn't been fully wired into LoopSimplify/LCSSA, and it isn't
clear that those transforms want to support those forms anyways. They
all run late anyways, so this is harmless. Similarly, LSR is left alone
because it already carefully manages its forms and doesn't need to get
fused into a single loop pass manager with a bunch of other loop passes.
LoopReroll didn't use loop simplified form previously, and I've updated
the test case to match the trivially different output.
Finally, I've also factored all the pass initialization for the passes
that use this technique as well, so that should be done regularly and
reliably.
Thanks to James for the help reviewing and thinking about this stuff,
and Ben for help thinking about it as well!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17435
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@261316 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The insertLoop() API is only used to add new loops, and has confusing
ownership semantics. Simplify it by replacing it with addLoop().
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251064 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Remove remaining `ilist_iterator` implicit conversions from
LLVMScalarOpts.
This change exposed some scary behaviour in
lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp around line 1770. This patch changes a
call from `Function::begin()` to `&Function::front()`, since the return
was immediately being passed into another function that takes a
`Function*`. `Function::front()` started to assert, since the function
was empty. Note that `Function::end()` does not point at a legal
`Function*` -- it points at an `ilist_half_node` -- so the other
function was getting garbage before. (I added the missing check for
`Function::isDeclaration()`.)
Otherwise, no functionality change intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@250211 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Doing so could cause the post-unswitching convergent ops to be
control-dependent on the unswitch condition where they were not before.
This check could be refined to allow unswitching where the convergent
operation was already control-dependent on the unswitch condition.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@249874 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: This patch adds block frequency analysis to LoopUnswitch pass to recognize hot/cold regions. For cold regions the pass only performs trivial unswitches since they do not increase code size, and for hot regions everything works as before. This helps to minimize code growth in cold regions and be more aggressive in hot regions. Currently the default cold regions are blocks with frequencies below 20% of function entry frequency, and it can be adjusted via -loop-unswitch-cold-block-frequency flag. The entire feature is controlled via -loop-unswitch-with-block-frequency flag and it is off by default.
Reviewers: broune, silvas, dnovillo, reames
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11605
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@248777 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
We should either require the DT info to be available, or check if it's
available in every place we use DT (and we already miss such check in
one place, which causes failures in some cases). As other loop passes
preserve DT and it's usually available, it makes sense to just require
it here.
There is no regression test, because the bug only shows up if pass
manager decides to clean DT info right before LoopUnswitch. If
loop-unswitch is run separately, DT is available, so bug isn't exposed.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13036
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@248230 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
