langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-07-21 12:05:30 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

[PR #31824] fix(web): correct systemFeatures contract output type to match API response #33422

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 20:53:15 -05:00 by yindo · 0 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-21 20:53:15 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Original Pull Request: https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/31824

State: closed
Merged: No

Important

  1. Make sure you have read our contribution guidelines
  2. Ensure there is an associated issue and you have been assigned to it
  3. Use the correct syntax to link this PR: Fixes #<issue number>.

Summary

Fixes #31820

The oRPC contract for /system-features was expecting SystemFeatures directly, but the backend API returns { features: SystemFeatures }. This mismatch caused the login page to show "No authentication method configured" even when authentication methods were properly enabled in .env.

image

Root cause:
In PR #30885 (oRPC contract migration), the contract output type was defined incorrectly:

// Before (incorrect)
.output(type<SystemFeatures>())

// After (correct)
.output(type<{ features: SystemFeatures }>())

Changes:

  • Update contract output type to { features: SystemFeatures }
  • Update fetchSystemFeatures to destructure features from response

Screenshots

Before After
before Login shows "No authentication method configured" after Login form displays correctly

Checklist

  • This change requires a documentation update, included: Dify Document
  • I understand that this PR may be closed in case there was no previous discussion or issues. (This doesn't apply to typos!)
  • I've added a test for each change that was introduced, and I tried as much as possible to make a single atomic change.
  • I've updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I ran make lint and make type-check (backend) and cd web && npx lint-staged (frontend) to appease the lint gods
**Original Pull Request:** https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/31824 **State:** closed **Merged:** No --- > [!IMPORTANT] > > 1. Make sure you have read our [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) > 1. Ensure there is an associated issue and you have been assigned to it > 1. Use the correct syntax to link this PR: `Fixes #<issue number>`. ## Summary Fixes #31820 The oRPC contract for `/system-features` was expecting `SystemFeatures` directly, but the backend API returns `{ features: SystemFeatures }`. This mismatch caused the login page to show "No authentication method configured" even when authentication methods were properly enabled in `.env`. <img width="1553" height="792" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cd9f4de3-7256-4358-b100-e083b5399c34" /> **Root cause:** In PR #30885 (oRPC contract migration), the contract output type was defined incorrectly: ```typescript // Before (incorrect) .output(type<SystemFeatures>()) // After (correct) .output(type<{ features: SystemFeatures }>()) ``` **Changes:** - Update contract output type to `{ features: SystemFeatures }` - Update `fetchSystemFeatures` to destructure `features` from response ## Screenshots | Before | After | |--------|-------| | ![before](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/login-error-before.png) Login shows "No authentication method configured" | ![after](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/login-form-after.png) Login form displays correctly | ## Checklist - [ ] This change requires a documentation update, included: [Dify Document](https://github.com/langgenius/dify-docs) - [x] I understand that this PR may be closed in case there was no previous discussion or issues. (This doesn't apply to typos!) - [x] I've added a test for each change that was introduced, and I tried as much as possible to make a single atomic change. - [x] I've updated the documentation accordingly. - [x] I ran `make lint` and `make type-check` (backend) and `cd web && npx lint-staged` (frontend) to appease the lint gods
yindo added the pull-request label 2026-02-21 20:53:15 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 20:53:15 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label pull-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#33422
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?