This teaches AArch64TargetLowering::shouldSinkOperands to sink splat
shuffles to certain neon intrinsics, so that they can make use of the
lane variants of the instructions that are available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112994
The form 'for co_await' is part of CoroutineTS instead of C++20.
So if we detected the use of 'for co_await' in C++20, we should emit
a warning at least.
Add a fork test that models what happens on Mac
where fork calls malloc/free inside of our atfork
callbacks.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, yln
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114250
Add an alias of `addi [x], zero, imm` to generate pseudo
instruction li, which makes assembly mush more readable.
For existed tests, users can update them by running script
`llvm/utils/update_llc_test_checks.py`.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112692
Step towards removing the hard coded behavior for this trait and to instead use common interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114208
This is based on conversations with a couple of folks currently running buildbots. There's a couple pieces which didn't make it in, but this tries to cover the common themes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114325
The functionality of hasAnalyzableMemoryWrite() is effectively
subsumed by getLocForWriteEx(), which will return None if the
instruction is not analyzable. The implementations don't match
exactly (e.g. getLocForWriteEx() does not limit non-calls to
stores), but in conjunction with the isRemovable() check, it ends
up being the same.
If we're looking only at the lower bound, the actual modulus
doesn't matter. This is a leftover from when I wanted to consider
the upper bound as well, where the modulus does matter.
If (X urem M) >= C we know that X >= C. Make use of this fact
when computing the implied condition range.
In some cases we could also establish an upper bound, but that's
both tricker and not interesting in practice.
Alive: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/R5ZGSW
A first step towards modeling preheader and exit blocks in VPlan as well.
Keeping the vector loop in a region allows for changing the VF as we
traverse region boundaries.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113182
This is a generalization/extension of the existing and/or
folds noted with TODO comments. Those have a one-use
constraint that is not necessary.
Potential follow-ups are noted by the TODO comments in
the new function. We can also call this function from
other binop visit* functions, but we need to add tests
first.
This solves:
https://llvm.org/PR52543https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/NWuCR5
