This is the first set of instructions with a ".b" modifier thus we need to add the required code to disassemble a MSA128B register class.
Patch by Matheus Almeida
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191415 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In more detail, this patch adds the ability to parse, encode and decode MSA registers ($w0-$w31). The format of 2RF instructions (MipsMSAInstrFormat.td) was updated so that we could attach a test case to this patch i.e., the test case parses, encodes and decodes 2 MSA instructions. Following patches will add the remainder of the instructions.
Note that DecodeMSA128BRegisterClass is missing from MipsDisassembler.td because it's not yet required at this stage and having it would cause a compiler warning (unused function).
Patch by Matheus Almeida
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191412 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The binutils assembler supports a mode called DOLLAR_DOT which treats
the dollar sign token as a reference to the current program counter if
the dollar sign doesn't precede a constant or identifier.
This commit adds a new MCAsmInfo flag stating whether or not a given
target supports this interpretation of the dollar sign token; by
default, this flag is not enabled.
Further, enable this flag for PPC. The system assembler for AIX and
binutils both support using the dollar sign in this manner.
This fixes PR17353.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191368 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Patch by Ana Pazos.
1.Added support for v1ix and v1fx types.
2.Added Scalar Pairwise Reduce instructions.
3.Added initial implementation of Scalar Arithmetic instructions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191263 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
LLVM would crash when trying to come up with a relocation type for
assembly like:
movabsq $V@TPOFF, %rax
Instead, we say the relocation type is R_X86_64_TPOFF64.
Fixes PR17274.
Reviewers: dblaikie, nrieck, rafael
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1717
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191163 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Allow binutils .type and .section directives to take the following
forms:
- @<type>
- %<type>
- "<type>"
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191134 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For some reason I never got around to adding these at the same time as
the signed versions. No idea why.
I'm not sure whether this SystemZII::BranchC* stuff is useful, or whether
it should just be replaced with an "is normal" flag. I'll leave that
for later though.
There are some boundary conditions that can be tweaked, such as preferring
unsigned comparisons for equality with [128, 256), and "<= 255" over "< 256",
but again I'll leave those for a separate patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190930 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
We indicate that the object files are safe by emitting a @feat.00
absolute address symbol. The address is presumably interpreted as a
bitfield of features that the compiler would like to enable. Bit 0 is
documented in the PE COFF spec to opt in to "registered SEH", which is
what /safeseh enables.
LLVM's object files are safe by default because LLVM doesn't know how to
produce SEH handlers.
Reviewers: Bigcheese
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1691
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190898 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In particular, this means we emit non-external symbols defined to
variables, such as aliases or absolute addresses.
This is needed to implement /safeseh, and it appears there was some
confusion about what symbols to emit previously.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190888 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The '?' flag uses the last section group if the last had a section
group. We treat combining an explicit section group and the '?' as a
hard error.
This fixes PR17198.
Reviewers: rafael, bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1686
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190768 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For alignment purposes, the instruction array will always have an even
number of entries, with the final entry potentially unused (in which
case the array will be one longer than indicated by the count of unwind
codes field).
Reviewed by Anton Korobeynikov, Charles Davis and Nico Rieck.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190767 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
data structures.
The Win64 EH data structures must be of type IMAGE_REL_AMD64_ADDR32NB
instead of IMAGE_REL_AMD64_ADDR32. This is easiely achieved by adding
the VK_COFF_IMGREL32 modifier to the symbol reference.
Change also references to start and end of the SEH range of a function
as offsets to start of the function.
Reviewed by Jim Grosbach, Charles Davis and Nico Rieck.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190766 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously we modelled VPR128 and VPR64 as essentially identical
register-classes containing V0-V31 (which had Q0-Q31 as "sub_alias"
sub-registers). This model is starting to cause significant problems
for code generation, particularly writing EXTRACT/INSERT_SUBREG
patterns for converting between the two.
The change here switches to classifying VPR64 & VPR128 as
RegisterOperands, which are essentially aliases for RegisterClasses
with different parsing and printing behaviour. This fits almost
exactly with their real status (VPR128 == FPR128 printed strangely,
VPR64 == FPR64 printed strangely).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190665 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add basic assembly/disassembly support for the first Intel SHA
instruction 'sha1rnds4'. Also includes feature flag, and test cases.
Support for the remaining instructions will follow in a separate patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190611 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Use the new instruction deprecation feature to mark mftb (now replaced with
mfspr) and dst (along with the other Altivec cache control instructions) as
deprecated when targeting cores supporting at least ISA v2.03.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190605 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The 'Deprecated' class allows you to specify a SubtargetFeature that the
instruction is deprecated on.
The 'ComplexDeprecationPredicate' class allows you to define a custom
predicate that is called to check for deprecation.
For example:
ComplexDeprecationPredicate<"MCR">
would mean you would have to define the following function:
bool getMCRDeprecationInfo(MCInst &MI, MCSubtargetInfo &STI,
std::string &Info)
Which returns 'false' for not deprecated, and 'true' for deprecated
and store the warning message in 'Info'.
The MCTargetAsmParser constructor was chaned to take an extra argument of
the MCInstrInfo class, so out-of-tree targets will need to be changed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190598 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The main complication here is that TM and TMY (the memory forms) set
CC differently from the register forms. When the tested bits contain
some 0s and some 1s, the register forms set CC to 1 or 2 based on the
value the uppermost bit. The memory forms instead set CC to 1
regardless of the uppermost bit.
Until now, I've tried to make it so that a branch never tests for an
impossible CC value. E.g. NR only sets CC to 0 or 1, so branches on the
result will only test for 0 or 1. Originally I'd tried to do the same
thing for TM and TMY by using custom matching code in ISelDAGToDAG.
That ended up being very ugly though, and would have meant duplicating
some of the chain checks that the common isel code does.
I've therefore gone for the simpler alternative of adding an extra
operand to the TM DAG opcode to say whether a memory form would be OK.
This means that the inverse of a "TM;JE" is "TM;JNE" rather than the
more precise "TM;JNLE", just like the inverse of "TMLL;JE" is "TMLL;JNE".
I suppose that's arguably less confusing though...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190400 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
expression uses an assembler temporary symbol from an assignment. In this case
the symbol does not have a fragment so the use of getFragment() would be NULL
and caused a crash. In the case of an assembler temporary symbol we want to use
the AliasedSymbol (if any) which will create a local relocation entry, but if
it is not an assembler temporary symbol then let it use that symbol with an
external relocation entry.
rdar://9356266
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190096 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These were pretty straightforward instructions, with some assembly support
required for HLT.
The ARM assembler is keen to split the instruction mnemonic into a
(non-existent) 'H' instruction with the LT condition code. An exception for
HLT is needed.
HLT follows the same rules as BKPT when in IT blocks, so the special BKPT
hadling code has been adapted to handle HLT also.
Regression tests added including diagnostic tests for out of range immediates
and illegal condition codes, as well as negative tests for pre-ARMv8.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@190053 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
