Summary:
When building out-of-tree tools, there are several macros available to
automate linking against llvm. An examples is `add_llvm_executable`, or
the clang variant of this.
These macros use the LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB option to decide whether to
link against libraries defined by setting LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS or to
link against libLLVM instead. Currently this is problematic in
out-of-tree targets, because they cannot identify whether this option is
required or even available. If the option was enabled in LLVM's own
build, the clang libraries are built against libLLVM, so a client
linking against those must link against it too. On the other hand the
client can't just always link against it, because it might not be
available.
This is related to D44391, but that change assumed the client knew
whether they wanted the dylib or not.
Reviewers: mgorny, beanz, labath
Reviewed By: mgorny
Subscribers: bollu, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49193
llvm-svn: 337366
Imagine we have a file with few sections, and one of them is .foo
with index N != 0.
Problem is that when llvm-objdump is given a -section=.foo parameter
it lists .foo as a section at index 0. That makes impossible to write
test cases which needs to find the index of the particular section,
while ignoring dumping of others.
The patch fixes that.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49372
llvm-svn: 337361
http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/2003-12-17/ch4.eheader.html
says that e_shnum and/or e_shstrndx may have special values if
"the number of sections is greater than or equal to SHN_LORESERVE" or
"the section name string table section index is greater than or equal to SHN_LORESERVE (0xff00)"
Previously llvm-readobj was unable to dump such files, patch changes that.
I had to add a precompiled test case because it does not seem possible to
prepare a test using yaml2obj or llvm-mc (not clear how to make .shstrtab
to have index >= SHN_LORESERVE).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49369
llvm-svn: 337360
This patch adds the following instructions:
MUL - multiply vectors, e.g.
mul z0.h, p0/m, z0.h, z1.h
- multiply with immediate, e.g.
mul z0.h, z0.h, #127
SMULH - signed multiply returning high half, e.g.
smulh z0.h, p0/m, z0.h, z1.h
UMULH - unsigned multiply returning high half, e.g.
umulh z0.h, p0/m, z0.h, z1.h
llvm-svn: 337358
* Delete a no-longer-used override, and mark the other
getRegisterTypeForCallingConv() as override.
* SPE only supports i32, not i64, as the internal type, so simply remove
the type check, so that DestReg and Opc are provably always set.
GCC 6.4 did not warn about either of the above.
llvm-svn: 337350
The X86ISD::MOVLHPS/MOVHLPS should now only be emitted in SSE1 only. This means that the v2i64/v2f64 types would be illegal thus we don't need these patterns.
llvm-svn: 337349
I'm trying to restrict the MOVLHPS/MOVHLPS ISD nodes to SSE1 only. With SSE2 we can use unpcks. I believe this will allow some patterns to be cleaned up to require fewer bitcasts.
I've put in an odd isel hack to still select MOVHLPS instruction from the unpckh node to avoid changing tests and because movhlps is a shorter encoding. Ideally we'd do execution domain switching on this, but the operands are in the wrong order and are tied. We might be able to try a commute in the domain switching using custom code.
We already support domain switching for UNPCKLPD and MOVLHPS.
llvm-svn: 337348
Summary:
The Signal Processing Engine (SPE) is found on NXP/Freescale e500v1,
e500v2, and several e200 cores. This adds support targeting the e500v2,
as this is more common than the e500v1, and is in SoCs still on the
market.
This patch is very intrusive because the SPE is binary incompatible with
the traditional FPU. After discussing with others, the cleanest
solution was to make both SPE and FPU features on top of a base PowerPC
subset, so all FPU instructions are now wrapped with HasFPU predicates.
Supported by this are:
* Code generation following the SPE ABI at the LLVM IR level (calling
conventions)
* Single- and Double-precision math at the level supported by the APU.
Still to do:
* Vector operations
* SPE intrinsics
As this changes the Callee-saved register list order, one test, which
tests the precise generated code, was updated to account for the new
register order.
Reviewed by: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44830
llvm-svn: 337347
This is the lead-up to having SPE codegen. Add the rest of the
instructions, along with MC tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44829
llvm-svn: 337346
The presence of these symbols in the symbol table can cause symbol type
mismatch errors (or undefined symbol errors on emulated TLS targets)
and they can't be ICF'd anyway.
llvm-svn: 337338
Nest any classes not used outside of a file into anon. Nest any classes used
across files in llvm-objcopy into namespace llvm::objcopy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49449
llvm-svn: 337337
We need to explicitly state what happens when an invariant promised by
load metadata is violated at runtime, since it's come up repeatedly.
It's possible we want to specify that the result of the load is poison
in some cases, rather than undefined behavior, if the constraint is
violated. That would allow preserving the metadata when the load is
hoisted, but doesn't allow propagating metadata based on control flow.
We currently do transforms based on control flow for nonnull metadata
(in PromoteMemToReg).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47854
llvm-svn: 337325
Clarify that violating nnan and ninf can lead to undefined behavior.
This allows more aggressive optimizations based on those assumptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47963
llvm-svn: 337323
These are all methods that, while not currently used in the
Itanium demangler, are generally useful enough that it's
likely the itanium demangler could find a use for them. More
importantly, they are all necessary for the Microsoft demangler
which is up and coming in a subsequent patch. Rather than
combine these into a single monolithic patch, I think it makes
sense to commit this utility code first since it is very simple,
this way it won't detract from the substance of the MS demangler
patch.
llvm-svn: 337316
InstCombine has a cast transform that matches a cast-of-select:
Orig = cast (Src = select Cond TV FV)
And tries to replace it with a select which has the cast folded in:
NewSel = select Cond (cast TV) (cast FV)
The combiner does RAUW(Orig, NewSel), so any debug values for Orig would
survive the transform. But debug values for Src would be lost.
This patch teaches InstCombine to replace all debug uses of Src with
NewSel (taking care of doing any necessary DIExpression rewriting).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49270
llvm-svn: 337310
Summary:
The only thing he suggested that I've skipped here is the double-wide
multiply instructions. Multiply is an area I'm nervous about there being
some hidden data-dependent behavior, and it doesn't seem important for
any benchmarks I have, so skipping it and sticking with the minimal
multiply support that matches what I know is widely used in existing
crypto libraries. We can always add double-wide multiply when we have
clarity from vendors about its behavior and guarantees.
I've tried to at least cover the fundamentals here with tests, although
I've not tried to cover every width or permutation. I can add more tests
where folks think it would be helpful.
Reviewers: craig.topper
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49413
llvm-svn: 337308
Previously we were assuming whole program compilation. Now that
separate compilation is a thing we need to update this pass.
Firstly, it can no longer assert on the existence of malloc and free.
This functions might not be in the current translation unit. If we
need them then we will generate not imports for them.
Secondly the global helper function we create should be marked as
weak since we will be generating a separate copy in each translation
unit.
Finally the names of the symbols used must be unique and fixed since
they need to agree across translation units.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49263
llvm-svn: 337301
Previously we passed 'null_frag' into the instruction definition. The multiclass is shared with MOVHPD which doesn't use null_frag. It turns out by passing X86Movsd it produces patterns equivalent to some standalone patterns.
llvm-svn: 337299
Add llvm-mca tests demonstrating how LEA instructions are currently modelled. Once this is working on btver2 I'll copy the test file to the other target directories.
llvm-svn: 337297
We're going to work on this in a separate review focusing more on documenting
the View and probably removing some of the less-interesting/less-useful pieces.
This reverts r337219,337225
llvm-svn: 337295
Function `expandCheckImmOperand` should always check if the input machine
instruction is passed by reference before calling method `getOperand()` on it.
Found while working on a patch that relies on `expandCheckImmOperand` to expand
a scheduling predicate.
llvm-svn: 337294
Spell out destructor, copy/move constructor and assignment operators for
MSVC STL, where set<T>::const_iterator is not trivially copy constructible.
llvm-svn: 337292
The Mips FastISel back-end does not extend i1 values while lowering icmp.
Ensure that we bail into DAG ISel when handling this case.
Patch by Dragan Mladjenovic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49290
llvm-svn: 337288
Once we resolved an undef in a function we can run Solve, which could
lead to finding a constant return value for the function, which in turn
could turn undefs into constants in other functions that call it, before
resolving undefs there.
Computationally the amount of work we are doing stays the same, just the
order we process things is slightly different and potentially there are
a few less undefs to resolve.
We are still relying on the order of functions in the IR, which means
depending on the order, we are able to resolve the optimal undef first
or not. For example, if @test1 comes before @testf, we find the constant
return value of @testf too late and we cannot use it while solving
@test1.
This on its own does not lead to more constants removed in the
test-suite, probably because currently we have to be very lucky to visit
applicable functions in the right order.
Maybe we manage to come up with a better way of resolving undefs in more
'profitable' functions first.
Reviewers: efriedma, mssimpso, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma, davide
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49385
llvm-svn: 337283
